True or False: It is acceptable to break confidentiality if a peer threatens to harm themselves or others.

Breaking confidentiality in situations where a peer threatens to harm themselves or others is generally considered necessary for safety. This principle is rooted in ethical standards and laws that prioritize the wellbeing of individuals and the community. When a threat is made, the potential risk to life is paramount, and confidentiality cannot supersede the obligation to protect individuals from harm.

In these circumstances, it is important to take appropriate measures, which may include informing authorities, mental health professionals, or others who can intervene to ensure safety. Confidentiality is essential in building trust and fostering open communication in peer support relationships, but the duty to protect life takes precedence when there is an immediate threat.

While the other choices touch upon aspects of confidentiality, the urgency of the situation regarding potential self-harm or harm to others provides a clear justification for breaking confidentiality to safeguard lives. This aligns with ethical practices in mental health and substance use recovery support.